🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to reinitiate nuclear talks with the United States as long as it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy was effective, and shared new appeals had originated from go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Walking a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult path since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a situation of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Suddenly Concluded

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president declaring the locations had been destroyed. Afterward, European countries employed their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if negotiations resume.

Trump in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a show.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war revealed the clash could not be settled by military means. He stated the assaults began with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and cooperation, making faith hard to restore.

Negotiations Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, rules and principles must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will get a answer in the equivalent approach."

Restoration and Rebuilding

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We effectively endured this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, continues to exist. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this invasion."